1 2 3 Next»
Comment
by MacDonald, West Sussex (20 Nov 08 16:06)
about
this REVIEW.
I do wonder if there are two Fred Olsen Braemars. My wife and I are regulars on the one refitted this year. I think it now takes roughly 100 more passengers rather than 300 suggested by one correspondent. And you can have waiter service at ANY meal in the Thistle restaurant. Hardly need to ask; the staff are happy to serve. If P&O is so good, stay there. A lot more money, generally, on a larger less friendly ship. Me ? Olsen every time. Excellent value, nice ship and wonderul crew.
Report this comment
Opinion: Agree
Comment
by Gleed, Crediton (05 Sep 08 17:09)
about
this REVIEW.
Agree absolutely with the tenure of this review. Our first "Fred" cruise was trans Atlantic west-east just before the refit.
The catalogue of items not available after Day 3 was extensive and laughable [inc breakfast tea, skimmed milk, cider, some beers and some scotches]. Our one complaint to the Pursers Office was never acknowledged or dealt with. It WAS like Butlins at sea both in service and facilities and range of food [one evening the choices at dinner included macaroni cheese, shepherds pie and beef [for the scond night running]] And the dress code!!!!!!
We too come to Fred from another line - Princess - and we shall not cruise with Fred again. We met many people who are firm Fred Olsen fans and good for them. But not for us, we are back with Princess for range of food and excellence of service.
And all of that is fine - one man's ceiling is another man's floor.
Report this comment
Comment
by spencer, Hereford (01 Sep 08 17:11)
about
this REVIEW.
The last part of the review was the key , you get what you pay for. We have never been with P&O because we cannot afford it.We have been on Braemar twice and are going again in December, after your review we wonder if the ship will feel the same now that it has been lengthened. They should have made sure the refit was completed before starting the summer cruises.We enjoyed reading your review and we are so glad that you would go with Fred Olsen again we hope we will not be disappointed in December.We have just been on the Balmoral to the fiords(see my review!),we did not like it as much as the old Braemar but it could have been something to do with the time of year August to us is a family month and as we being of a certain age, try to avoid families(been there done that)!!!We must say that the chidren in general were better behaved than the parents.Smoking is such a nuisance on cruise ships ,it should be banned, why should smokers pollute the air for everyone else.(we are both ex-smokers so have no sympathy at all.)
Report this comment
Opinion: Agree
Comment
by G, Southend On Sea (26 Aug 08 21:36)
about
this REVIEW.
I was unfortunate enough to be on Braemar for her first cruise after being lengthend. It was comparable to a building site, should never have sailed. I have discribed this cruise to friends and family as the cruise from hell and even if I were to use my imagination and picture it completed without the builders on board, the dirt and dust the noise of drills, hammers and sanding machines and without stepping over carpet contractors. I would also discribe it like Butlins at sea. The only saving grace of the entire cruise was three couples that we met on board and spent most evenings with and the entetainment. Had it not been for them we would have left the ship. This is only my second cruise the first was with Princess. If this is an example of a five star cruise then I might as well give up cruising.
Report this comment
Opinion: Disagree
Comment
by James, Swindon (26 Aug 08 13:12)
about
this REVIEW.
This person really can't have much of a clue on cruises. Almost everything negetive that he has mentioned about Fred Olsen has happened to us on P&O.
Fred Olsen are the best cruise company out there in my eyes. Enjoyed every cruise that i've been on with them. I would advise everyone to try Fred Olsen
Report this comment
Comment
by Denison, Cleckheaton (27 Aug 08 00:24)
about
a COMMENT by James (26 Aug 08 13:12)
Here we go again from those who "disagree". What exactly are you disagreeing with? Are you saying that the cabins do have a fridge or that the washing lines don't extend across the bathroom blocking the sink/mirror or that the safety drill in/outside the library didn't descend into farce or...? Why do all you FO fans just keep coming out with your "I love Fred Olsen", disparaging me but not identifying one thing that I mentioned regarding THAT cruise that is false? How dare you say that I "don't have much of a clue on cruises" but still can't argue your case for Fred Olsen?
Yes, I have only been cruising since 2000 and since my first one with First Choice (Bolero) have only cruised with P&O, the last one as recently as June but during that time I have been on all P&O ships except Ventura and am now only 11 days short of the P&O "gold tier" standard. Re-read my review and you will see that it was predominantly aimed at P&O passengers who might want an idea what this particular cruise line was like seen through the eyes of one who has a base line of expectation when boarding a cruise ship. You will note that there are a lot of positive comments but when I find something that I feel P&O do better then I say so! I would use them again and I say that also, so stop getting all precious about FO and accept that not everyone shares your devotion to them. They are not in the same league as P&O but their prices reflect that. Lighten up folks!!!
Report this comment
Comment
by Pickard, Keighley (11 Sep 08 15:41)
about
a COMMENT by Denison (27 Aug 08 00:24)
Oh dear! I am sailing on the Braemar in December. The first time with Fred Olsen. I am also a P & O passenger and have been sailing with them since 1980. I take 2 or 3 cruises a year with them.What appealed on this cruise was the visit to Honduras, which as, as you might guess, has now been cancelled!
I wait in fear and trepidation to experience Fred Olsen. I will compare it with the Artemis, which I am criusing on, in February.
Report this comment
Opinion: Disagree
Comment
by Johnstone, Duns (22 Aug 08 16:04)
about
this REVIEW.
I can only assume that this contributor was of a certain age and had got confused over which ship he was sailing on. It is certainly not the same Braemar that we were on. Surely he must be thinking of his previous occasion with another cruise line. No-one should be put off by this negative and truly unrepresentative review.It is a slur on both the ship and it's staff and written, I would say, by a professionaly complainer. Certainly not the type of person I would like as a cruise campanion. Fortunately we didn't meet unless he was the moaning old bore who complained when I spoke in the library! Braemar and those who run her are definitely five star.
Report this comment
Comment
by Denison, Cleckheaton (22 Aug 08 20:05)
about
a COMMENT by Johnstone (22 Aug 08 16:04)
What a pathetic rant in which you say nothing to counter the valid points I made in my comment. Is your answer always to to make a personal attack rather than come up with a valid counter argument? No,I was not confused nor am I "of a certain age" - I didn't notice you in the gym? Were you actually on that cruise? Thank heavens that I was not your cruise companion as I have a sneaky suspicion you are a smoker?
If you want to extol the virtues of Fred Olsen then go ahead and write your own review of the cruise, assuming you were actually on it. Otherwise you are portraying yourself as someone who would feel totally at home on "Butlins at sea".
Report this comment
Comment
by Johnstone, Duns (25 Aug 08 11:21)
about
a COMMENT by Denison (22 Aug 08 20:05)
You're quite right. I was never in the gym.Your sneaky suspicion about me being a smoker is totally wrong. It's a filthy habit and not one I would engage in. I can't comment about Butlins - I've never been! Best of luck with your cruise provider in the future. By the way, we definitely were on Braemar, deck 2 in the new section. Very comfortable.
Report this comment
1 2 3 Next»
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||


















